- Home
- Administration
- Departments
- Schools
- Community
- Parents & Students
- Staff Resources
- Calendars
- District Calendar 2012-2013
- District Calendar 2011-2012
- Board Calendar
- Assesment Calendar 2011-2012
- Progress Monitor 2011-2012
- Employee Calendars
- Adult Ed Calendar
- BTES Calendar
- BTMS Calendar
- BES Calendar
- FPCHS Calendar
- FTI Calendar
- ITMS Calendar
- MHS Calendar
- OKES Calendar
- PATHWAYS Calendar
- Phoenix Calendar
- RES Calendars
- WES Calendar
- FCYC Calendar
- G.W. Carver Community Center Calendar
| Criteria for Scoring |
|
Semi-Finalist Projects will be identified by each school and submitted to the district to be considered for designation as a Finalist Project. A panel of experts, selected by Flagler County Schools Instructional Technology Team, will name the top entries (the “Finalists”) based on the following rubrics covering content, organization and technical quality:
A. Content and Organization |

| Criteria | 5-4 Points | 3-2 Points | 1-0 Points |
|
Creativity / Originality |
Provides fresh, meaningful & interesting insights into the subject of the production. |
Project is fairly standard in its presentation of the subject. | Project does not reflect a true understanding of the subject. |
|
Emotional Impact / Attitude
(Most projects should have a professional serious attitude throughout. Humor is great, but just being silly, isn’t). |
Heightens viewer attention and interest. Has a strong effect on human emotions or feelings. | Maintains viewer attention and interest, however, it has only a moderate effect on the viewers’ emotions. | Very little emotional impact on the viewer. |
|
Organization |
Shows a clear and obvious planning with consistent format & design. All sources are properly cited. |
Some planning is evident, however, format & design are not consistent. Sources are not properly cited. |
Project was not well planned and format & design are not consistent. Sources are not cited. |
|
Continuity / Structure |
Shows that the information or story is paced and developed in a way that keeps viewers interested and helps them understand the meaning. |
The information or story is not presented in a way that keeps viewers interest. The producers’ message is somewhat confusing. | The information or story is presented in a random manner. The producers’ message is not clear. |
|
Essential Question / Purpose |
Information is clear, appropriate and correct. Project achieves its stated purpose. |
Information is conflicting. Project does not clearly support its stated purpose. | Information is incorrect. Project does not support its stated purpose. |
B: Technical Quality
| Criteria | 5-4 Points | 3-2 Points | 1-0 Points |
|
Audio (Projects requiring sound) |
Background music and sound effects (if present) balance with speaking voices, and are appropriate to content. Speaking voices are clear and easy to understand. | Background music and sound effects overpower the speaking voices, and are not aligned to the content. | Background music and sound effects are difficult to hear. |
|
Vocal Quality (Projects requiring narration) |
The vocal performers speak clearly, and at an appropriate speed. They are lively and enthusiastic. |
The vocal performers speak clearly and at a good pace, but have little expression. |
The vocal performers appear to be unsure of the words in the script and have little expression. |
|
Editing / Transitions |
Scene changes are smooth and appropriately placed. Cuts/transitions used are appropriate and do not distract the audience. Images (if included) are appropriate, easily understood, and add useful information. |
Scene changes are smooth and appropriately placed. Cuts/transitions used are a bit excessive and distracting to the audience. |
Scene changes are abrupt and transitions are too flashy and very distracting to the audience. |
| Timing / Flow / Synchronization | The narration and visuals move at a suitable pace. Length is right for the amount of information (not to short not too long). Animated objects move smoothly. |
The narration and visuals move too quickly. Length is too short for the amount of information presented. |
The narration and visuals are not in sync. The visuals do not always match the content of the narration. |
|
Grammar / Punctuation / Spelling (Projects including text) |
Onscreen text is correct (taking into account the grade of the producers). |
Onscreen text has a few grammar or spelling errors. |
Onscreen text has multiple grammar, punctuation and spelling errors. |
|
Focus / Lighting |
The images are clear, and the lighting is appropriate for the desired mood. |
The images are fairly clear, but the lighting does not indicate a mood. |
The images are out of focus, or the lighting makes the content difficult to see. |
|
Camera Techniques (All productions using cameras) |
The angle of the shot is effective in showing the subject and/or action appropriately. |
The angle of the shot makes the subject and/or action difficult to view. |
The angle of the shot does not capture the intended subject and/or action. |
|
Composition / Clarity / Colors |
The elements within a scene (the main subject, supporting subjects, fore- ground and background) are arranged in a pleasing way. The images, graphics, and fonts are clear. The color palette and the contrasts between dark and light are appropriate for the desired mood. |
The elements within a scene are arranged in a random manner. The images, graphics, and fonts are not visually pleasing. The color palette and the lack of contrast between dark and light make the fonts difficult to read. |
The elements within a scene are distracting to the eye. The images, graphics, and fonts are disorganized and do not result in a cohesive composition. |
